Published in: Uncategorised

Context Engineering for AI Coding 101

Every single time I meet with a team trying to onboard AI coding agents, I face the same question: how to make AI assistants (Claude, Copilot, Cursor) code our way, consistently?

Here is the answer.

Why Context Engineering Matters

AI assistants are powerful, but in real-world codebases they are often unreliable.

They produce code that compiles but fails tests, introduces regressions, or ignores architecture and naming conventions.

Sometimes it “works,” but often it simply doesn’t because the model doesn’t understand the system it’s coding for.

That happens when assistants miss or forget context: architecture, dependencies, standards, and shared utilities — everything that makes your codebase yours.

Context Engineering is the craft of capturing, structuring, and distributing that missing context so AI generates code that is not just syntactically valid but architecturally correct and team-aligned.

It’s the difference between an AI that codes in isolation and one that codes as part of your team.

Part 1 — What You’ll Need

Ingredient	Purpose	Where to Configure
Standards & Rules	Team conventions, architecture, policies	`Claude.md`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, `cursor/rules/`
Recipes / Prompts	Reusable step-by-step task guides	Claude Slash Commands, Copilot Prompt Files, Cursor Commands
Personas	Predefined AI roles (e.g. senior reviewer, security expert)	Claude Subagents, Copilot Chat Modes
Hooks	Automations for checks & context sync	Claude & Cursor Hooks
Compaction Habit	Summarize sessions to keep context focused	Within your agent loop

Part 2 — The Manual of Context Engineering

Step 1 — Define Your Blueprint

Start with a context inventory of your core rules and decisions:


					/docs/
├── architecture.md
├── naming-conventions.md
├── api-patterns.md
├── testing-standards.md

Then normalize it into AI-readable context files:

AI Tool	File	Description
Claude	`CLAUDE.md`	Long-term memory for project standards and workflows
Copilot	`.github/copilot-instructions.md`	Global rules applied to all generations
Cursor	`.cursor/rules/coding-rules.mdc`	Persistent coding rules and conventions

🪄 Start small — one rule per principle. Example: “Use Fetch wrapper for all HTTP requests,” not “follow our architecture philosophy.”

Step 2 — Build Reusable Recipes

Recipes are repeatable workflows that standardize how tasks are done.

Tool	File	Example
Claude	`.claude/commands/add-endpoint.md`	“Add a new REST endpoint with validation and tests.”
Copilot	`.github/prompts/add-endpoint.prompt.md`
Cursor	`.cursor/commands/add-endpoint.md`

Each recipe is a micro playbook:


					# Add a new endpoint
1. Create `routes/user.ts`
2. Add POST `/api/users`
3. Validate body with `zod`
4. Write Jest test in `__tests__/user.test.ts`

Save recipes as Markdown in your repo and call them via /add-endpoint or similar commands.

Step 3 — Compact Frequently (Avoid Context Overflow)

Like cleaning your workspace between assembly steps.

“Frequent Intentional Compaction” = regularly summarizing what’s happened so far into a smaller, more useful context.

Workflow:

After 10–15 exchanges, pause.
Ask your AI to summarize progress → progress.md.
Start the next session with that summary as context.

🎯 Keep context utilization between 40–60 %; beyond that, quality drops.

Step 4 — Split Work Across Subagents

For complex tasks, separate concerns using Subagents (Claude) or Chat Modes (Copilot):

Agent Role	Purpose	Setup
`research`	Reads code, maps dependencies	Subagent or “Plan” mode
`planner`	Writes implementation plan	Custom chat mode
`implementer`	Writes code	Default mode

This mirrors the Research → Plan → Implement loop described in advanced context workflows. Each subagent starts with a clean context, focusing only on its task — no noise from previous steps.

Step 5 — Build Guardrails

Add automation hooks to enforce consistency:

Claude Hooks → pre/post actions (tests, context syncs)
Copilot & Cursor Rules → file patterns, imports, naming

{
  "description": "Automatic code formatting",
  "hooks": {
    "PostToolUse": [
      {
        "matcher": "Write|Edit",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "packmind-cli lint .",
            "timeout": 30
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}

🪛 Think of this as tightening bolts before deployment.

Step 6 – Validate Your Assembly

Run the same task in Claude, Copilot, and Cursor (“Add endpoint”).
Compare outputs against your standards.
Version-control every rule and recipe — this is your AI playbook.

✅ Expected result: consistent, working code that complies with your standards.

Common Pitfalls

Mistake	Symptom	Fix
Overstuffed context	AI forgets or confuses tasks	Compact frequently
No structure	AI ignores rules	Centralize standards (`CLAUDE.md`, instructions.md)
Wrong granularity	Too abstract / verbose	Write rules like unit tests
No reset points	Context degrades over time	Use subagents or restart after compaction
No scoping	Context window fills too fast	Scope rules to paths (`*/.spec.ts`) and use nested rules per directory

Example Project Layout (Minimum Viable Context Kit)

.github/
 ├── copilot-instructions.md
 ├── prompts/
 │    ├── add-endpoint.prompt.md
 │    └── review-code.prompt.md
.cursor/
 └── commands/add-endpoint.md
claude/
 ├── CLAUDE.md
 ├── skills/
      └── backend-standards/
          ├── SKILL.md
          ├── API_PATTERNS.md
          └── TEST_GUIDE.md

Each file represents a reusable, versioned piece of your AI workstation.

Before vs After Context Engineering

Without	With Context Engineering
Frequent errors and broken code	Reliable outputs that compile and pass tests
Output drift across assistants	Consistent behavior in Claude, Copilot, Cursor
Developer fatigue from re-prompting	Compact loops and reusable recipes
One monolithic context	Modular, auditable context artifacts

Start Context Engineering with Packmind

Create your Context Kit using the folder layout above.
- Start with one rule, one recipe, and one AI assistant.
Run your first Context Sprint:
- Pick a feature → define Research / Plan / Implement stages.
- Measure where AI aligns or drifts.
Distribute your playbook across assistants with Packmind OSS — no manual setup.
- Capture your standards from reviews.
- Sync them automatically to Claude, Copilot, and Cursor.
- Detect and fix drift in real time.
Iterate weekly: compact, refine, enforce — and watch your AI assistants become teammates.

Managing all these files, agents, and context updates manually is complex. Packmind handles the complexity for you.

👉 Create your engineering playbook in minutes with Packmind OSS and make every AI assistant code your way.